Conservantes en productos de higiene y cosméticos, medicamentos tópicos y productos de limpieza doméstica en España / Preservatives in Personal Hygiene and Cosmetic Products, Topical Medications, and Household Cleaners in Spain

Introducción: Los conservantes se agregan a cosméticos, limpiadores domésticos y otros productos industriales para impedir el crecimiento de microorganismos. Desafortunadamente, pueden sensibilizar a usuarios expuestos. Material y métodos: Entre enero y junio de 2015 se analizaron las listas de los ingredientes de 2.300 productos de venta en España: 1.093 dermocosméticos, 458 productos de higiene, cosméticos y limpiadores domésticos de venta en supermercados, 636 medicamentos tópicos y 113 cosméticos de herbolario. Se evaluó la distribución de una amplia variedad de conservantes en las distintas categorías de productos. Resultados: Conservantes tales como el fenoxietanol, el ácido cítrico, el benzoato sódico y el sorbato potásico estuvieron ampliamente representados en todas las categorías de cosméticos. Se detectaron parabenos en el 16,1% de los dermocosméticos, el 14,45% de los cosméticos de supermercado, el 0,88% de los cosméticos de herbolario, el 5,18% de los medicamentos tópicos y ningún producto de limpieza. Se objetivaron isotiazolinonas en el 2,56% de los dermocosméticos, el 18% de los cosméticos de supermercado, el 7,9% de los cosméticos de herbolario, el 63,63% de los limpiadores domésticos y en ningún medicamento tópico. Contenían liberadores de formaldehído el 5,76% de los dermocosméticos, el 6,42% de los cosméticos de supermercado, el 7,96% de los cosméticos de herbolario, el 3,93% de los medicamentos tópicos y el 16,74% de los limpiadores. Conclusiones: La evaluación de la frecuencia de los conservantes en los productos de nuestro entorno permite una estimación indirecta del grado de exposición a cada uno de ellos. Se precisa impulsar medidas que conduzcan a una restricción en el uso de los conservantes más problemáticos (AU)

Introduction: Preservatives are added to cosmetic, household cleaning, and other industrial products to prevent the growth of microorganisms. Unfortunately, exposure to these substances can cause sensitization. Material and methods: Between January and June 2015, we analyzed the ingredients of 2300 products commercially available in Spain to identify the frequency of a wide variety of preservatives in different product categories. We analyzed 1093 skin care and cosmetic products sold exclusively in pharmacies (dermocosmetics), 458 household cleaning and personal hygiene and cosmetic products sold in supermarkets, 636 topical medications, and 113 cosmetic products sold in a herbal shop. Results: Phenoxyethanol, citric acid, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate were very common in all the cosmetic product categories. Parabens were present in 16.1% of dermocosmetic products, 14.45% of cosmetic products available in supermarkets, 0.88% of cosmetic products available in the herbal shop, 5.18% of topical medications, and in none of the cleaning products. Isothiazolinones were identified in 2.56% of dermocosmetic products, 18% of cosmetic products in supermarkets, 7.9% of cosmetic products in the herbal shop, 63.63% of household cleaners, and in none of the topical medications. Formaldehyde releasers were detected in 5.76% of dermocosmetic products, 6.42% of cosmetic products sold in supermarkets, 7.96% of cosmetic products sold in the herbal shop, 3.93% of topical medications, and 16.74% of household cleaners. Conclusions: Evaluation of the presence of preservatives in everyday products allows us to indirectly estimate exposure levels to each one. Measures restricting the use of the most problematic preservatives need to be strengthened (AU)

Preservatives in Personal Hygiene and Cosmetic Products, Topical Medications, and Household Cleaners in Spain. / Conservantes en productos de higiene y cosméticos, medicamentos tópicos y productos de limpieza doméstica en España.

INTRODUCTION: Preservatives are added to cosmetic, household cleaning, and other industrial products to prevent the growth of microorganisms. Unfortunately, exposure to these substances can cause sensitization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January and June 2015, we analyzed the ingredients of 2300 products commercially available in Spain to identify the frequency of a wide variety of preservatives in different product categories. We analyzed 1093 skin care and cosmetic products sold exclusively in pharmacies (dermocosmetics), 458 household cleaning and personal hygiene and cosmetic products sold in supermarkets, 636 topical medications, and 113 cosmetic products sold in a herbal shop. RESULTS: Phenoxyethanol, citric acid, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate were very common in all the cosmetic product categories. Parabens were present in 16.1% of dermocosmetic products, 14.45% of cosmetic products available in supermarkets, 0.88% of cosmetic products available in the herbal shop, 5.18% of topical medications, and in none of the cleaning products. Isothiazolinones were identified in 2.56% of dermocosmetic products, 18% of cosmetic products in supermarkets, 7.9% of cosmetic products in the herbal shop, 63.63% of household cleaners, and in none of the topical medications. Formaldehyde releasers were detected in 5.76% of dermocosmetic products, 6.42% of cosmetic products sold in supermarkets, 7.96% of cosmetic products sold in the herbal shop, 3.93% of topical medications, and 16.74% of household cleaners. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the presence of preservatives in everyday products allows us to indirectly estimate exposure levels to each one. Measures restricting the use of the most problematic preservatives need to be strengthened.

¿Tienen los cirujanos más dificultades en la atención de los pacientes hospitalizados no intervenidos respecto a los intervenidos? / Do surgeons have more difficulties in the hospital care of non-surgery patients than with surgery patients?

OBJETIVO: Un porcentaje variable de los enfermos ingresados en los servicios quirúrgicos no son operados por diversas razones. Nuestro objetivo es comprobar si los cirujanos tienen más dificultades en la atención de los pacientes ingresados no operados que en los operados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Hemos incluido a todos los pacientes de edad ≥ 14 años dados de alta el año 2010 de Cirugía General, Ginecología, Urología y Otorrinolaringología. Las variables principales fueron la estancia, mortalidad, reingresos y número de interconsultas solicitadas a servicios médicos. Las variables secundarias: edad, sexo, número de ingresos urgentes, número total de diagnósticos y el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICh). RESULTADOS: Entre el 8,7 y el 22,8% de los pacientes ingresados en estos servicios no son operados. Los pacientes no operados tienen significativamente mayores estancia, mortalidad, reingresos y solicitudes de interconsultas que los operados, con significativamente mayores edad (excepto Urología), número de diagnósticos, ingresos urgentes e ICh (excepto Urología). CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes ingresados en los servicios quirúrgicos que no son operados tienen mayor mortalidad, reingresos y solicitudes de interconsultas que los operados, probablemente por su mayor complejidad médica y urgencia del ingreso. Ello podría indicar una mayor dificultad en su manejo por parte de los cirujanos

OBJECTIVE: A variable percentage of patients admitted to surgical departments are not operated on for several reasons. Our goal is to check if surgeons have more problems in caring for non-operated hospitalized patients than operated ones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included all patients aged ≥ 14 years discharged in 2010 from General Surgery, Gynaecology, Urology, and Otolaryngology. The main variables were the length of stay, mortality, readmissions, and number of consultations/referrals requested to medical services. Secondary variables were age, sex, number of emergency admissions, total number of diagnoses, and the Charlson comorbidity index (ICh). RESULTS: Between 8.7% and 22.8% of patients admitted to these surgical departments are not operated on. The non-operated patients had a significantly higher stay, mortality, readmissions and consultations/referrals requests than operated ones, with significantly higher age (except Urology), number of diagnoses, emergency admissions and ICh (except Urology). CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to surgical departments and are not operated on have higher mortality, readmissions and consultation/referrals requests than those operated on, which may be due to their greater medical complexity and urgency of admission. This suggests a greater difficulty in their care by surgeons

Resultados de una intervención de descolonización de Staphylococcus aureusen pacientes portadores a los que se indica una prótesis articular / Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in carrier patients undergoing joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCCIÓN: La infección de prótesis articular (IPA) es una complicación con graves repercusiones cuyo principal agente responsable en la mayoría de los casos es Staphylococcus aureus. El propósito del presente estudio es evaluar si la descolonización de los pacientes portadores de S. aureus a los que se indica una prótesis articular consigue una disminución en la incidencia de IPA por S. aureus. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de intervención antes-después en el que se comparó la incidencia de IPA en pacientes bajo cirugía de prótesis articular de rodilla o cadera entre enero y diciembre de 2011 a los que se realizó estudio de detección de colonización nasal por S. aureus y erradicación si procedía, con un protocolo de mupirocina intranasal y ducha con clorhexidina, con respecto a una serie histórica de pacientes intervenidos entre enero y diciembre de 2010. RESULTADOS: En el período de control se realizaron 393 artroplastias en 391 pacientes. En el período de intervención se implantaron 416 prótesis en 416 pacientes. Se realizó estudio de colonización a 382 pacientes (91,8%), de los que 102 fueron positivos (26,7%) y se trataron según el protocolo. Se produjeron 2 casos de de IPA por S.aureus frente a 9 en el año control (0,5% vs 2,3%, odds ratio [OR]: 0,2, intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 0,4 a 2,3, p = 0,04). CONCLUSIÓN: En nuestro estudio la aplicación de un protocolo de detección de colonización/ erradicación de S.aureus consiguió un descenso significativo de la incidencia de IPA por S.aureus respecto a un control histórico

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication with serious repercussions and its main cause is Staphylococcus aureus. The purpose of this study is to determine whether decolonization of S. aureuscarriers helps to reduce the incidence of PJI by S. aureus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An S. aureus screening test was performed on nasal carriers in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty between January and December 2011. Patients with a positive test were treated with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine soap 5 days. The incidence of PJI was compared with patients undergoing the same surgery between January and December 2010.RESULTS: A total of 393 joint replacements were performed in 391 patients from the control group, with 416 joint replacements being performed in the intervention group. Colonization study was performed in 382 patients (91.8%), of which 102 were positive (26.7%) and treated. There was 2 PJI due S. aureuscompared with 9 in the control group (0.5% vs 2.3%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4 to 2.3, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the detection of colonization and eradication of S.aureus carriers achieved a significant decrease in PJI due to S.aureus compared to a historical group

[Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in carrier patients undergoing joint arthroplasty]. / Resultados de una intervención de descolonización de Staphylococcus aureus en pacientes portadores a los que se indica una prótesis articular.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication with serious repercussions and its main cause is Staphylococcus aureus. The purpose of this study is to determine whether decolonization of S.aureus carriers helps to reduce the incidence of PJI by S.aureus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An S.aureus screening test was performed on nasal carriers in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty between January and December 2011. Patients with a positive test were treated with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine soap 5 days. The incidence of PJI was compared with patients undergoing the same surgery between January and December 2010. RESULTS: A total of 393 joint replacements were performed in 391 patients from the control group, with 416 joint replacements being performed in the intervention group. Colonization study was performed in 382 patients (91.8%), of which 102 were positive (26.7%) and treated. There was 2 PJI due S.aureus compared with 9 in the control group (0.5% vs 2.3%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4 to 2.3, P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the detection of colonization and eradication of S.aureus carriers achieved a significant decrease in PJI due to S.aureus compared to a historical group.

DoSurgeons Have More Difficulties in the Hospital Care of Non-surgery Patients Than With Surgery Patients?

OBJECTIVE: A variable percentage of patients admitted to surgical departments are not operated on for several reasons. Our goal is to check if surgeons have more problems in caring for non-operated hospitalized patients than operated ones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included all patients aged ≥ 14 years discharged in 2010 from General Surgery, Gynaecology, Urology, and Otolaryngology. The main variables were the length of stay, mortality, readmissions, and number of consultations/referrals requested to medical services. Secondary variables were age, sex, number of emergency admissions, total number of diagnoses, and the Charlson comorbidity index (ICh). RESULTS: Between 8.7% and 22.8% of patients admitted to these surgical departments are not operated on. The non-operated patients had a significantly higher stay, mortality, readmissions and consultations/referrals requests than operated ones, with significantly higher age (except Urology), number of diagnoses, emergency admissions and ICh (except Urology). CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to surgical departments and are not operated on have higher mortality, readmissions and consultation/referrals requests than those operated on, which may be due to their greater medical complexity and urgency of admission. This suggests a greater difficulty in their care by surgeons.

Pacientes quirúrgicos ingresados: asistencia compartida con Medicina Interna / Hospitalized surgical patients comanaged by Internal Medicine specialists

No disponible